About three years ago, my colleague Rob Mueller asked me if I had an idea for a technical paper we could write for the International Astronautical Congress in Prague, the Czech Republic. I did, in fact, have a topic that was beginning to fascinate me. I had been looking at pictures from Titan, Saturn’s largest moon, sent back by the Huygens probe in 2005 after parachuting through the thick, orange atmosphere. Seeing Titan’s regolith from less than a meter away, with alien pebbles strewn across the mysterious sand, changed my view of Titan from a mere “moon” to a very real “world.” (The regolith is the broken up rocky material and soil that covers the surface of a planetary body.) Suddenly I wanted to go there! I wanted to head out toward those alien horizons where no human had gone before. And probably, since I couldn’t realistically go there, a part of me wanted to fulfill the fantasy of exploring Titan by studying its regolith, because studying regolith is what I do in my job. For years we had been developing technologies to work with the regoliths of the Moon and Mars: to land on it, to drive on it, to excavate it, to process it for resources, to build with it, and to study it for science. But what about the regoliths everyhere else in the solar system? So I suggested to Rob that we compare and contrast the regoliths of all of the planets, moons and minor planets throughout the solar system.
I had no idea, then, that writing this paper would change the course of my life.
Over the next several weeks, Rob and I along with the help of Jim Mantovani pored over information about the solar system to hastily write this paper. As we wrote it, we began to notice the beautiful pattern of resources in our solar system. This has been noted by others, of course. John Lewis talked about it in at least one of his books. But for me it was a revelation. I began to realize that you can’t fully utilize the vast resources of this solar system unless you set up a logistics network to move things around. Accessible metals are mostly in the asteroid belt. Accessible volatiles are mostly in the outer solar system. Humans may want to ship them around so we can do things things on a grand scale all over the solar system: building colonies everywhere where we can; establishing research stations and observatories everywhere else. Ships could travel back and forth on regular routes for both people and resources. This vision of the solar system as a living, pulsating civilization drew me in, and suddenly exploring the Moon and Mars for scientific discovery was not enough. I wanted to make space colonization happen!
It seemed obvious from the outset that solar system civilization would start by mining the Moon because it is close and we can solve technological problems more easily when we can access the hardware. I explained this at greater length in a NASA interview a few years ago. I now admit that the asteroid miners might be right; perhaps it will be easier to start industry on Near Earth Asteroids brought into Earth’s orbit rather than on the Moon…or maybe not. I still lean toward the Moon as the better place to start space industry, but I am glad that companies are trying it both ways simultaneously so we have a better chance that someone will succeed. (B.N., there are also those who want to start colonies on Mars right away, and props to them if they pull it off and start space industry first!)
Right about this time I went to the 100 Year Starship Symposium and presented the vision of robots harvesting resources on this vast scale as best I could, telling the attendees that it doesn’t make sense to skip our solar system and go straight to interstellar travel. I went away realizing that if I wanted people to take this seriously, I needed to prove the point with quantitative analysis. So I set about developing a computer model of solar system industry. I eventually focused on just the first phase of this industry: the process of getting it started on the Moon. I developed a modeling method and enlisted the help of Rob and Jim, as well as Tony Muscatello for his expertise in the lunar chemical processing hardware. We reviewed the published literature and obtained data from the hardware that we and our contractors had recently built to utilize space resources during lunar and martian exploration. We put this information into the computer model and it began spitting out graphs for us. We analyzed what it meant and wrote another paper and published it. This paper is in the Journal of Aerospace Engineering:
The formatted article is copyrighted by the journal but the verbal and graphical content is freely available to the public since it was written by four government employees. Click on the link at the top of the page to get an uncopyrighted version.
In this paper, I laid out six steps that we could take to develop lunar industry. Each step is actually a “generation” of robotic hardware and resource processing machines. Each generation is a little more complex and a little more independent of Earth than the prior generation. After six of these, the industry becomes completely independent of Earth and makes everything it needs from lunar resources, including the regolith, sunlight, and polar ices. Once this industry becomes independent of Earth’s resources, it moves to the asteroid belt where the best resources are located. From there it can grow exponentially. The modeling shows that within just a couple more decades, this industry could have a million times the industrial capacity of the entire United States. Within just ten more years, a billion times. By then we will have achieved a Kardashev Type 2 civilization and will have everything we need to move toward becoming a galactic civilization.
Surprisingly, the model indicates that we can achieve all this for just about 1/3 the cost of the International Space Station, so spread over 40 years it will be about 0.04% of the U.S. federal budget. This is highly affordable, to say the least! There is absolutely no reason why we can’t do this, or why we should delay it at all. We just need to convince the decision makers that this is real.
But suppose my modeling was off by an order of magnitude. Does that mean it is not feasible? No, of course not, because then it would be just 0.4% of the federal budget, which is about what NASA gets every year right now. It is still very feasible. And there are ways to reduce the cost even further. We can make it an international project to spread the costs between nations. We can let commercial space businesses develop significant portions of this industry as a profit-making enterprise supported by consumer demand. And we can involve crowd-sourcing, where citizen space explorers participate as telepioneers, owning and teleoperating portions of the industry in space. (I think that should be an important element of our future space industry, and this blog will discuss it at length very soon.)
So for the benefits we will receive, it will cost us next-to-nothing. I ask you to get a copy of the paper and read it. Then, please, add to the analysis. Generate your own concepts. Improve ours. Analyze. Investigate. Challenge. Improve. We need a wider discussion to vet the concepts and in the end, I hope, to build support for going forward. We stated in the paper that our modeling was intended mainly to create interest in this topic and to encourage a wider set of investigators to look into it. That means you.
So there you have it. We can colonize the solar system in six easy steps. Well, the model is preliminary, so maybe seven steps, or ten, or…the actual count doesn’t matter. It’s clear that the process of starting up space industry can be short enough that we could do it in our generation and our children will live in a much brighter, much more amazing future, and we can be the ones to watch it, and make it, unfold.
I would love to hear your thoughts on this!







This concept makes me jump out of bed every morning eager to work on my slice of the puzzle! (Advancing my knowledge of and contributing what I can to additive manufacturing technologies.)
Hi,
I probably should have browsed your site a bit longer when I first found it. This is exactly what I have been looking for.
Could I get a copy of the paper to read?
I have a vision of an extremely large scale decentralised yet still organised crowd based design/manufacturing/managing/funding system. Possibly extremely naive, but I have been looking for space related projects or problems that could be scaled up from extremely small scales to those large scales.
Launch technologies seem to be too hard so far, both in terms of complexity, but also financing. However the design, manufacture, and financing of robots or robotic components seem to be a much better field seeing all the current DIY movements around the globe focusing on such projects.
I have also been thinking about utilising drones in my own field of work /natural resource management/. I lack expertise to actually design or build anything, but I have been thinking of using my industry as a testbed for some of the technologies we could also use elsewhere in the solar system.
Hi,
I think this Concept is the right step to colonized ouer solar system
please sent me the uncopyrighted preprint
I have been writing up something on what I call the “Asteroid Project” – along similar lines.
http://210.48.92.9:8082/319
Though I now see I have to write a section on how to avoid WW3 when nations see their industrial economies threatened.
I am interested in the details of your paper and the stages you have evolved.
I am also interested to see how the game evolves. This is a great idea to get young people involved and thinking about such a complex project and its ramifications for their future. As the game evolves it could be a modelling tool for the project.
Regards, Paul Nash
please send to me a copy of your paper!
thanks
This sounds really interesting. I would also like to read your paper.
These are fascinating ideas! Do please send me a copy of your paper.
Please add me to your list to receive a copy of your paper. The concept is fascinating and exciting. Keep up the great posts! Thanks!
All, I need your email address to send you the preprint of the paper. To send me your address securely, you can follow me on Twitter and then I’ll follow back. Then you can DM (on Twitter) your email address to me. Then I can email the preprint back to you. Thanks!
hello mr metzeger, Id love to read your paper! my email is [email protected]
Fantastic. Am working on a story involving people settling out at the edge of the Solar System – articles and research like yours are a great help – well done!
This is a fascitanting topic! Please send me a copy of your paper, I would love the opportunity to contribute! [email protected]
Hello, I’d like a copy of your paper please. This is of my interest.
Hi, pls send paper to [email protected] – thanks!
I would love to receive a copy of your paper!
My email is: [email protected]
NASA in 2005 published a report that stated if we were to take all the Earth orbit crossing asteroids and the asteroids in the Asteroid Belt, and process them for materials we could build living space equal to 30,000 X the land area of Earth(58 million sq. miles)and be able to house a half a quadrillion people at half the current population/sq. mile we now have. Think Stanford torus, O’Neil cylinder, McKendree cylinder. If we tear apart all the planets, comets, asteroid we could build enough habitat for 2 quadrillion people. We don’t need to find planets around nearby stars. We just need the material. This link http://www.science20.com/robert_inventor/blog/asteroid_resources_could_create_space_habs_trillions_land_area_thousand_earths-116541 tells how that future might come about. No, we don’t have the tech to build space habitat equal to 58 million sq. miles, but I believe we have the tech to build 100,000 sq. mile torus or cylinders. NASA is considering a 1g component(a rotating assemblage) to the next space station. That would be the beginning of humankinds conquest of the Solar System, and nothing like what we have now. There is a point in our species future when we might consider the resources in the Earth too valuable(equal to 20,000 earths of living space) to remain a habitat for only the richest 10-20 billion people in the Solar System. There are 3 things pushing the future, zombie apocalypse not being one of these. They are: 1.) humans conquering space(here and around at least nearby stars) 2.) everlasting health/youth(stopping aging in the 11-14 yr. old range because aging would be far easier to control then) 3.) becoming one with our tech(cyborgism, not borg) nothing obvious more like super advances on the cellular level. Replacing cell parts with far advanced cellular machinery. Here are more Links on the subject of population: http://blog.nss.org/?cat=35also and here http://www.ignorancedenied.com/threads/8479-The-Wealth-Of-Ages?p=56390 All we lack as a species is imagination! There are 520 stars within a 100lys of Earth if only half are suitable for development we could increase the human species to 260 quadrillion people! If all those star systems are suitable for development(meaning: lacking intelligent life) we could use the resources to support a half a quintillion eternally young humans/cyborgs with open ended lifespans! All we lack is imagination! Make it so ..
After thought: there are 600 million star systems within 5000lys( http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/5000lys.html ) of Earth if 10% are suitable for future development they would support 60 sextillion human/cyborg inhabitants, and we can add 60 sextillion for every additional 10% we find useful.
Hi defeatdeath888,
interesting thoughts! I’ve heard others do calculations on how many humans can live in our solar system. Interesting perspective 🙂 Another factor to consider: the robotic tech we are developing will be able to make copies of itself and thus terraform worlds very rapidly. Then it can begin tearing itself down and restoring the surface of the planet to a non-industrial state to maximize its beauty and fitness for life. If we send out robotic spacecraft to other solar systems, they can use the resources of the small bodies to build up such a giant industry and then terraform one or more planets around that star before we arrive. Personally I would not want to live in an O’Neil cylinder or Stanford Torus or the like. I’d want to live on a planet with mountains to climb and rivers to kayak. I think we could eventually transform the galaxy so there will be countless wild worlds waiting so we can discover the unexpected ecospheres in dark forests or on high mountains that resulted from the terraforming.
P.S.: Don’t forget to be first in line for longevity treatments when they arrive.
Here is a link to a document from Australia which states what technologies are needed to colonize the solar system.
https://www.scribd.com/document/321634026/How-to-colonize-the-solar-system-beyond